Parlement Mondial pour le 21e Siècle


Forum
Discussion
Follow the Discussion by Thread
Follow the Discussion by Date
Follow the Discussion by Theme
Syntheses
Documents
Calendar
Participants
Subscribe
Contact
english
french ·original·
spanish

in reply to :

replied to by :


inventing a way for a global cohabitation
Marie-France d'ABOVILLE
Saturday, November 02, 2002 2:40 PM


ºººAbstract: some ideas for juridico-political bases of global governance: to think about the power of decision, cultural foundations, management of natural resources, notions of happiness, supremacy, hegemony. To learn how to distinguish between decisions having good or bad fundaments. To accept or to refuse only after being well informed.ººº

In order to achieve global governance, the juridico-political notions to set in motion should include these principles:

No one should decide in place of the others, though help others to take *founded* decisions. For childhood this could be a pedagogical measure. For a developing country, it is a way for its autonomy.

The needs of people are not the same according to where they live in the planet. To avoid the amalgams between categories of people with the pretext of having some common features. The cultural habits have a founded background. *Equality* is an illogic utopia, especially due to the subjectivity.

Surface, subsoil and aerial space should not be the personal property of anybody. An individual, a country, should be only the *administrator* of communitarian goods which everybody should be allowed to benefit. The ways of management and distribution according to the needs should be submitted to common deliberations. They would be approved in *delegations of management*, and adjusted regularly to the fluctuations of needs. The term of *property* would be replaced advantageously by the expression *set in availability.*

In general, not to rely happiness to the possession of material goods or to the domination of others, but to the personal self-management in any particular context.

Efforts towards hegemony and supremacy are insidious and show big dangers. We need to frame them strictly by rules elaborated collectively, and to transform the rule of power into the rule of law. However, who will be the author of these laws, and who will make them respected??

It belongs to civil society to rise up and to say: We want this or that, for this well-found reason. We don't want this or that, for that well-found reason. Instead of accepting any manipulation with misleading pretexts.

Marie-France d'Aboville


WP21 Alliance Forum on a World Parliament for the 21st Century
E-mail : world-parl@forums.alliance21.org
Fax 1 717 264 5036
Information, inscriptions, désinscriptions: germa@alliance21.org
Alliance [FORUM]   [DISCUSSION]   [SYNTHESES]   [DOCUMENTS]   [CALENDAR]   [PARTICIPANTS]   [SUBSCRIBE]   [CONTACT]   [HOME]
Fondation Charles Léopold Mayer © 2003